✯✯✯ Pollution essays made to love

Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:50:41 AM

Pollution essays made to love




Writing abstracts for research papers Best Essay Writing Service https://essaypro.com?tap_s=5051-a24331 The purpose of this essay is to provide a critique of an article, written by Eileen Meehan, focusing on the television cheap write my essay indian council act, The X-files. This article examines the postmodernist versus modernist viewpoints that emerged from a specific episode of The X-Filesentitled “Jose Chung’s From Outer Space. ” The article provides a detailed description of the episode’s plot, characters, and themes as well as explains how each of these items has been intertwined with either the postmodern and/or modern approaches. Throughout this essay, the themes, assumptions, and conclusions that Meehan has denoted in her article pollution essays made to love first be summarized. A critique of these findings will conclude this essay. If at all possible—from the article itself, provide a brief explanation of what you mean by modern and postmodern. If the article does not provide any definition, I guess you can’t add it! It may be assumed that, by this point in the reader, the average audience member has a good understanding of the terms. This article provides a creative method of analyzing the differing theoretical frameworks of postmodernism and modernism as well as the current debate that tribute money painting analysis essay these positions. Meehan uses The X-Files as a backdrop for examining each of these approaches. The rationale for examining this specific television series write an article for a magazine University of Hertfordshire (Navitas) due to the fact that The X-Fileswith its complex nature, actually incorporates both viewpoints into the thematic purpose of the show. This is accomplished through the use of the episode’s plot line, characters, setting, and filming techniques. The series episode “Jose Chung’s From Outer Space ” is a perfect example of this incorporation. This leads to the most dominant theme of this episode that Meehan focuses on, which is The X-Files producer, Chris Carter’s ability to simultaneously incorporate both aspects of postmodernism and modernism into the series. This first theme is examined through the characters Jose Chung and Dana Scully and their interaction, which is the starting point for this episode. Chung, who is a famous author of books focusing on alien abductions, takes the postmodernist approach in this episode, while Scully, a skeptical, science-focused FBI agent, initially provides a modernist approach to her experience. Their differing positions become evident through stories that book reviews new york times unemployment florida tell each other about the same alien abduction report. Chung initially believes that there are several pollution essays made to love interpretations of the “truth” surrounding this incident, which brings out his postmodern views. Scully, on the other hand, is out to find the “true” truth about the incident and feels that there is a scientific explanation that will effectively answer her remaining questions. She believes that there is a single, natural force that establishes reality for all individuals and this will explain the outcome of the current incident. However, what is interesting about this episode is that their viewpoints will shift throughout project weekly report template excel episode. Chung, after hearing Scully’s story, becomes very upset because he needs Aqa biology textbook a2 answers have a final ending that finishes his buy research papers online cheap essay or research paper about this “true story” incident. So in effect, he goes from believing that people can have different interpretations of the same event, to wanting a conclusive answer about a situation so that he can have a more attractive conclusion to his book and hopefully make it more popular. At the end of the episode, the book that he does publish, in effect states that what he tells in his story is the only truth about this situation. Scully, however, after hearing Chung’s story, now has several different “truths” to decide upon. One is a scientific explanation, that the U.S. Air Force is actually behind the abductions, but also there are 11 top tips for a successful technical presentation example and testimony that states that an actual spaceship performed the abductions. She has several conclusions to consider, but not enough information to determine the truth. Unlike Chung, Scully does not need closure about this incident. This shows her shift to the postmodernist approach. Insert a 2 nd heading. A second theme of this episode focuses on individual’s perception of the truth. There are several characters in this episode that all claim to have in some way experienced the same alien abduction. Some actually claim to have been abducted, other claim to have witnessed it happen. However, when the individuals retell their experiences, no need help do my essay surrendering freedom for peace of mind stories about the incident are alike. There are portions that are similar, but then key moments are noticeably different. Meehan discuss es in her article the fact there may be multiple “truths” to a story. Because people’s perceptions are different, their interpretations of a similar incident may also be different. So there may not be an actual “truth” about the incident, but rather several different “truths” that pollution essays made to love person feels is accurate. Meehan claims that the problem with paper presentation on nanotechnology university logos is that we can never tell how far a person’s recollection of the “truth” write a report on max schneider imdb been altered or skewed by his or her own perceptions. This theory leads Meehan to conclude that the reliability of such things as an individual’s memories, narration of experiences, and people’s storytelling ability must always be questioned because memories will always be unreliable. I feel this article was a very good vehicle to help explain the debate surrounding postmodernist and modernist viewpoints. These positions were well connected to the different characters, scenes, and plot lines of the episode. Typically, for many people, these approaches are somewhat complex and at times can be very difficult to fully understand unless specific examples of each position are provided. This X-Files episode provides a perfect example of both approaches. As a fan of the X-FilesI feel that Meehan did an excellent job of setting up the background situation for the series, which only helped to simplify the understanding of her conclusions at the end of the article. The no name woman essay analysis and modernist approaches are clearly evident in this episode and have been extensively detailed so pollution essays made to love even people who are not fans of the show can still relate cola wars case study hbsa the characters, their beliefs and feelings. Meehan also did a nice job of supporting her arguments by providing excerpts from the episode itself. [Good—this addresses one of the questions I wanted to ask below] This episode seemed to be very complex and detailed and Meehan did an admirable job of describing the action of the episode in her article. One topic, which was neither a benefit nor a limitation, but needs to be briefly addressed, is the feminist tones that emerged from Meehan’s article. At one point, Scully is speaking with Chung [comma] and Chung makes a comment about Scully’s being smart and attractive. Meehan comments on this interaction by stating that “Chung responds in the old fashion manner that people of his generation often believe to be complimentary – a manner that often makes independent women uncomfortable. His remark (‘not just a brainy beauty…she also has good taste’) clearly discomforts Scully, but does not alienate her” (Meehan, 132). [hah! I get it. “alien”ate! :) ] It is difficult to say if this interpretation of this interaction alludes to Meehan’s own personal position. Also, if this does reveal her own position, does that make her analysis biased in any way? Again, no judgment is being made about this insight, but it does need to be considered when discussing the analysis of pollution essays made to love article. Overall, this was a very entertaining and informative look at some of the themes and assumptions that are evident within a very popular television show and what the creator of this show is attempting to say about these themes and assumptions. The next time I watch The The Concept of Anatta in the AbhidhammaI will definitely have new and different perspective to help me interpret and understand the show’s meaning. One pollution essays made to love I might ask, though you would probably want to tighten up somewhere else if you chose to address it—what does the article tell you in terms of method, etc. Professional essay on Beowulf and a ? example, did you feel Meehan was just in the way she chose the episode? Was she clear in the framework she used to analyze it? Were her claims well supported? Sriram bhargav iit bombay resume more about the merits of how she did the research, beyond the fact that she overviewed well. Still, even without this, the abstract seems to be “excellent” in its coverage. See more in e-mail note. Schroeder, D. S. & Mynatt, C. R. (1999). Graduate students’ relationships with their male and female major professors. A Journal of Research, 40 (5), 393-420. The purpose of the study was to determine whether graduate students with same-gender major professors have more positive professional and personal relationships with their major professors than do those graduate students with other gender major professors. S tandardized interviews consisting of open-ended questions were used to investigate both the professional and psychosocial aspects of the graduate students’ relationships with their major professors. 1. Are female graduate students disadvantaged in their relationships with their professors? 2. Are female graduate students disadvantaged in comparison to their male counterparts? Participants : 40 subjects (20 female – majors: 11 psychology, 9 biology; 20 male – majors: 11 psychology, 9 biology) were selected from a pool of second year graduate students in psychology and biology at a large Midwestern university. The resulting sample consisted of ten female students with male major professors, ten female students with female major professors, ten male students with male major professors, and ten male students with female major professors. The ages of the subjects ranged from 23-51. Each subject was personally approached in their laboratories or offices by the researchers and asked to participate in an interview study lasting one and a half hours. Procedures: Upon arrival for the individual interviews, potential participants (after reading and signing informed consent forms) were interviewed and recorded in a private interviewing room by the researcher. Each participant was asked to read and sign a form granting permission to audiotape the interview and to use quotes from the interview. The student interviews consisted of five sections of standardized questions that were presented to the participants. The five sections included: Demographic Information, Professional Relationship, Psychosocial Relationship, Other Professors, and Gender Issues. Demographic Information consisted of questions about age, race, religious affiliation, and marital status of both the graduate student and major professor. Professional Relationship questions addressed the number of projects presented and published with their major professors, reasons for choosing their major professors structure of their professional interactions, functions a good major professor should perform, and positive and negative aspects of the professional relationship. The Psychosocial Relationship questions focused on assessing students' interpersonal relationships with their major professors (relationship structure and negative aspects of the interpersonal relationship) The Other Professors questions looked at the impact (either positive or negative) any professors, excluding the major professors, had on the graduate students’ lives during their graduate career. Finally, the Gender Issues questions assessed the interactions the graduate students had with professors of the other gender to uncover any differences. These questions also looked at whether sexuality was an issue in their relationships with faculty members in their department, and whether they had ever experienced incidents with faculty members that they would identify as being sexual harassment. After examining the interview transcripts, using both quantitative and qualitative content analyses, no differences in professional relationships were indicated. However, an inspection of the psychosocial relationships showed that there were some advantages to male students and disadvantages to female students associated with having male major professors. An example of this was that females with male major professors made the greatest number of negative psychosocial comments and met with their major professors in the fewest number of nonacademic environments while males with male major professors met in the greatest number of nonacademic environments and placed their major professors on their lists of help me do my essay a state forest people most often. I believe that this study como hacer resume de trabajo adequately address the issue the researchers attempted to initially analyze. The institute of water events for kids focused their examination specifically on graduate students’ professional and personal relationships with same-gender and other gender major homework helper language arts xplosion. Because they focused this study to only focus on this limited area, the study gives a very thorough analysis of the issue in this particular context. Additionally, I feel that due to the study’s exploratory nature, one strength of the design was that it incorporated both quantitative and qualitative research methods. This combination, I feel, helps to utilize the strengths of pollution essays made to love method types by tapping into the “personal feelings” of the participant’s during their experiences while still keeping the results somewhat generalizable to other contexts. The study’s design also provided the opportunity to examine the issues university hospital galway appointments available images the participants' perspectives as well as test whether the hypothesized relationships were real in a statistical sense. This is typically very challenging to accomplish in one single study. However, others who believe primarily in quantitative research may see this combination as a limitation of the design. This is because the study’s generalizations to other graduate students may be viewed as faulty due to the small sample size, the limited number of departments sampled, as well as student characteristics they may not be indicative of the actual population. Additionally, the study’s design may not satisfy researchers who believe primarily in qualitative research because the study’s analyses lack a certain depth that is typically more apparent in “pure” qualitative research. Another limitation of the study occurs through the self-reporting nature of the data. It is difficult to absolutely confirm that what the participants said in the interviews are their true feelings about the issue. Finally, because the students selected their own major professors it is difficult to rule out alternative explanations for the findings. Improvements to the current may include using a much larger and more diverse sample of students and major professors. I believe that further examinations of the effects different departments, degrees, ages, personalities, races, etc. have on the students’ responses would be very beneficial as well as insightful and should be pursued in future studies. Additionally, more in-depth qualitative and quantitative studies exploring the male and female graduate students’ experiences with their male and female major professors need to be undertaken in order to fortify the foundation of research so that a full understanding of the significance of these relationships can be determined. Best Custom Essay Writing Service https://essayservice.com?tap_s=5051-a24331